| What
Had To Be Proved David Grossman -
Ostensibly,
it has become clear beyond a shadow of doubt that "the Palestinian
Authority is infested with terror from head to toe," as Chief of
Staff Shaul Mofaz said at the press conference that seemed to be an
attempt
to bring back for a moment the glory of the heroic 1950s, if not of
Entebbe
itself. But what
proof has been obtained here? Proof that if you oppress a people for
35
years, and humiliate its leaders, and harass its population, and do
not
give them a glimmer of hope, the members of this people will try to
assert
themselves in any way possible? And would any of us behave differently
from the Palestinians in such a situation? And did we behave any differently
when for years we were under occupation and tyranny? Avshalom
Feinberg and Yosef Lishansky set out for Cairo to bring money from there
to the Nili underground so that the Jewish community in Palestine could
assert itself against the Turks. The fighters of the Haganah, the Lehi
and the Etzel underground movements collected and hid as many weapons
as they could, and their splendid sliks (arms caches) are to this day
a symbol of the fight for survival and the longing for liberty, as were
the daring weapons acquisition missions during the British Mandate (which
were defined by the British as acts of terror). When "we"
did these things, they were not terrorist in nature. They were legitimate
actions of a people fighting for its life and liberty. When the Palestinians
do them, they become "proof" of everything we have been so
keen
to prove for years now. It was embarrassing
and irksome to hear the chief of staff scolding the Palestinians for
"wasting
their money on acquiring arms instead of seeing to their poor and hungry
populace" - the words of a man whose soldiers - who follow the
government's
instructions - harass Palestinians morning, noon and night, impoverish
them and starve them. No less embarrassing was the journalistic reporting
of the seizure of the ship. The correspondents, excited by the heroism
of our soldiers, unanimously adopted the self-righteous declarations
of
the chief of staff and the prime minister about the Palestinians and
their
murderousness and the terrorism that burns in their breasts like a second
nature, almost. Now come
the days of celebration and rejoicing because "we told you so":
We told you that the Palestinians do not keep agreements (while we of
course stick to every agreement); we told you that they will do everything
possible to acquire attack weapons (while we aim narcissus stems at
the
windows of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's window in
Ramallah);
we told you that there is no one to talk to and therefore we should
keep
tightening the noose around their necks (and in this way undoubtedly
we
will bring about a profound change in the "Palestinian character,"
so that they will agree to accept all our conditions); we told you that
Arafat is in fact bin Laden (and we are disciples of the Dalai Lama).
In the attempt
to smuggle in the arms by ship, the Palestinians seriously violated
the
agreements with them and the IDF must, of course, do all it can to prevent
such escalation. Nevertheless, how can an entire people's sense of judgement
be so dulled? How can we repeatedly ignore the big picture and the sharp
sense that Israel, in its actions and in its failures to act, and especially
in the malevolent behavior of its prime minister, keeps pushing the
Palestinians
to such actions so that time after time they will provide us with that
"incontrovertible proof," in which there is in fact no real
benefit to our interests? These are
disgusting days. Days of total befuddlement of the senses. Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon will wring every possible drop of propaganda out of this
ship. The media, for the most part, will run panting after him. The
Israeli
street, too exhausted and apathetic to think, will adopt any definite
conclusion that will solve for it the internal and moral contradiction
in which it lives and reinforce its sense of righteousness, which has
been undermined at its base. From
Ha'aretz Daily - 1/6/2002 |
|
|